ELECTRIC MOTORS
to understand the differences and the issues
As a rough rule of thumb, DC electric motors can produce
approximately 1 hp per pound in the size range of 50 to 100 hp
Electric motors have a huge power density benefit over
gasoline-fueled internal combustion engines (ICE),
particularly in terms of total peak power - and a huge
durability benefit in terms of only 1 moving part!
Thus, for a similar power rating, an electric motor can weigh as
little as 50% of the weight of a comparable gasoline engine, yet still
produce significantly more peak power. This is due to the much higher
operating efficiency and short-term over-power potential of electric
motors. Electric motors are usually rated in kilowatts (kW); 1 hp= 746
W (or 1 kW =1.33 hp).
( see John Wayland's "White Zombie" below )
The most efficient designs typically use permanent magnets (instead of
coils) in the stators. These require less energy to create the basic
magnetic field, with permanent-magnet brushless DC motors usually being
much more efficient than older brush-equipped designs. They also offer
much higher reliability and virtually no maintenance.
Although brushless DC motors require a more sophisticated controller
unit (typically a three-phase, pulse width-modulated [PWM]), total
efficiency is typically 3-7% higher than brush-style motor. (Brushless
motors replace the brushes and commutators with a controller that
electronically switched the power to the coils, eliminating the brush
and commutator wear and arcing).
Brush-type motors can also be hazardous due to the possible use of
hydrogen on board for the fuel cells and the risk of ignition from
sparks produced by brushes.
|
|
Power Conversion Table (+)
|
Amps x Volts = Watts
watts / Volts = Amps
1000 watts = 1 kilowatt
|
.75 kilowatts = 1 horsepower
1 kilowatt = 1.34 horsepower
5,280ft = 1 mile = 63,360"
|
a 15" tire of 195/65/15 is about 25" in diameter
which is a circumference of 78" = 812 revolutions/mile
and so 60 mph = 812 rpm. . . . 120 mph = 1,624 rpm
148 mph = 2000 rpm
(at the tire)
|
Torque Conversion:
1.3556 ft/lb = 1 Nm = 1 joule (of work)
1 Nm = 0.73756 ft/lb
1 N = 0.22507 lbf (lbs of force)
|
|
The most commonly used motors in EV conversions are series wound
DC motors. Most new parts suppliers carry the Advanced DC or Warp
lines of motors. There are also quite a few folks using older General
Electric, Baldor, and Prestolite motors. Many older conversions were
based on surplus starter/generators. While these are still available,
they are difficult to mount, inefficient, and generally incompatible
with modern controllers. A conversion based on one of these might be
functional, but it would ultimately be disappointing. There are a few
decent surplus motors available from time to time. Forklift and
elevator motors are usually much to heavy to use, while golf cart
motors are too small. Recently, AC drive motors have become
available, and it is likely that more conversions will be using
them.
|
Another possibility:
|
Examples
John Wayland's White Zombie
0 to 60 in ~3.5 sec's.
1/4 mi in 11.466 sec's. @ 114.08 mph
Powered by dual 8 in.(”Siamese 8″) Warfield Dual armature
series-wound motors for 240+ hp w/ 772 ft. lbs. torque.
read more about it
The Quickest electric motorcycle: the KillaCycle
the KillaCycle team
In Nov 2007, the KillaCycle made a quarter-mile
run in 7.824 seconds and hit 168 mph
it weighs about 600 lbs.
It has two modified 6.7 inch Model L-91 Advanced DC Motors
The battery pack has/had a total of 990 A123 Systems M1 Li-Ion cells
with a total weight of 180 lbs.
read more about it
|
Electric Aircraft?
Electric-powered aircraft offer many benefits including dramatic
improvements in reliability and safety, lower maintenance and total
lifecycle costs, significant improvements in environmental
compatibility (noise, emissions and fuel), improved performance,
and improvements in ease of operation and passenger comfort.
The biggest benefits are reliability and safety. With only one
moving part (motor armature plus propeller), electrically powered
aircraft should be far less susceptible to failure; there's not
much to fail.
from
www.kitplanes.com/magazine/engines
|
|
Strength of an electromagnetic field
The strength of the electromagnetic field is determined by the amount
of current, number of coils of wire, and the distance from the wire.
UnitThe unit of magnetic force is called the tesla (T). Near a
strong magnet the force is 1-T. Another unit used is the gauss, where
104 gauss (10,000) equals 1 tesla.
CurrentThe strength of the magnetic field is proportional to the
current in the wire. If you double the current, the magnetic force is
doubled.
Since Voltage = Current x Resistance (V = I*R), you can
double the current in a wire by doubling the voltage of the source of
electricity.
Turns of coilIf you wrap the wire into a coil, you increase the
magnetic force inside the coil, proportional to the number of turns. In
other words, a coil consisting of 10 loops has 10 times the magnetic
force as the wire uncoiled, with the same current flowing through it.
Likewise, a coil of 20 loops has 2 times the magnetic force than one with
10 loops.
Varies with distanceThe magnetic force decreases with distance.
It decreases proportionally to the square of the distance. For example
the force at 2 cm. from a wire is 1/4 that of at 1 cm., and the force at
3 cm. is 1/9 the force at 1 cm.
Effect of an iron core
When the coil is wrapped around an iron core, the strength of the
electromagnetic field is much greater than the same coil without the iron
core. This is because the atoms in the iron line up to amplify the
magnetic effect. The orientation of the atoms in the iron is called its
domain.
CurrentWhen you increase the current, the magnetic strength
increases, but it is not exactly linear as it is with the coil by itself.
The characteristics of the core cause the curve of magnetic strength
versus current to be an s-shaped hysteresis curve.
The shape of this curve depends on how well the material in the core
becomes magnetized and how long it remains magnetized. Soft iron loses
its magnetism readily, while hard steel tends to retain its magnetism.
Inductance
Inductance (measured in henries) is an effect which results from the
magnetic field that forms around a current carrying conductor. Electrical
current through the conductor creates a magnetic flux proportional to the
current. A change in this current creates a change in magnetic flux that,
in turn, generates an electromotive force (emf) that acts to oppose this
change in current. Inductance is a measure of the generated emf for a
unit change in current. For example, an inductor with an inductance of 1
henry produces an emf of 1 V when the current through the inductor
changes at the rate of 1 ampere per second. The inductance of a conductor
is increased by coiling the conductor such that the magnetic flux
encloses (links) all of the coils (turns). Additionally, the magnetic
flux linking these turns can be increased by coiling the conductor around
a material with a high permeability.
The energy (measured in joules, in SI) stored by an inductor is equal
to the amount of work required to establish the current flowing through
the inductor, and therefore the magnetic field.
An inductor is usually constructed as a coil of conducting material,
typically copper wire, wrapped around a core either of air or of
ferromagnetic material. Core materials with a higher permeability than
air confine the magnetic field closely to the inductor, thereby
increasing the inductance. Inductors come in many shapes. Most are
constructed as enamel coated wire wrapped around a ferrite bobbin with
wire exposed on the outside, while some enclose the wire completely in
ferrite and are called "shielded". Some inductors have an adjustable
core, which enables changing of the inductance. Inductors used to block
very high frequencies are sometimes made with a wire passing through a
ferrite cylinder or bead.
Inductors are used extensively in analog circuits and signal
processing. Inductors in conjunction with capacitors and other components
form tuned circuits which can emphasize or filter out specific signal
frequencies. Small inductances generated by a ferrite bead or torus
around a cable prevent radio frequency interference from being
transmitted down the wire. Smaller inductor/capacitor combinations
provide tuned circuits used in radio reception and broadcasting, for
instance.
Two (or more) inductors which have coupled magnetic flux form a
transformer, which is a fundamental component of every electric utility
power grid. The efficiency of a transformer increases as the frequency
increases; for this reason, aircraft used 400 hertz alternating current
rather than the usual 50 or 60 hertz, allowing a great savings in weight
from the use of smaller transformers.
An inductor is used as the energy storage device in a switched-mode
power supply. The inductor is energized for a specific fraction of the
regulator's switching frequency, and de-energized for the remainder of
the cycle. This energy transfer ratio determines the input-voltage to
output-voltage ratio. This XL is used in complement with an active
semiconductor device to maintain very accurate voltage control.
Inductors are also employed in electrical transmission systems, where
they are used to intentionally depress system voltages or limit fault
current. In this field, they are more commonly referred to as
reactors.
As inductors tend to be larger and heavier than other components,
their use has been reduced in modern equipment; solid state switching
power supplies eliminate large transformers, for instance, and circuits
are designed to use only small inductors, if any; larger values are
simulated by use of gyrator circuits.
capacitor
While an inductor opposes changes in current, a capacitor opposes
changes in voltage.
Imagine an electric car with the same acceleration capability as a
gas-powered sports car, or ultrafast rechargeable “batteries” that
can be recharged a thousand times more than existing conventional
batteries. According to physicists at North Carolina State University,
all of these things are possible, thanks to their research on a
polymer - or plastic material - that when used as a dielectric in
capacitors may allow the capacitors to store up to seven times more
energy than those currently in use.
see the news: advancements in
batteries and capacitors
Capacitor start motor
In a capacitor start motor, a starting capacitor is inserted in series
with the startup winding, creating an LC circuit which is capable of a
much greater phase shift (and so, a much greater starting torque). The
capacitor naturally adds expense to such motors.
Permanent split-capacitor motor
Another variation is the Permanent Split-Capacitor (PSC) motor (also
known as a capacitor start and run motor). This motor operates similarly
to the capacitor-start motor described above, but there is no centrifugal
starting switch and the second winding is permanently connected to the
power source. PSC motors are frequently used in air handlers, fans, and
blowers and other cases where a variable speed is desired. By changing
taps on the running winding but keeping the load constant, the motor can
be made to run at different speeds. Also provided all 6 winding connections
are available separately, a 3 phase motor can be converted to a capacitor
start and run motor by commoning two of the windings and connecting the
third via a capacitor to act as a start winding.
Stepper motors
Closely related in design to three-phase AC synchronous motors are stepper motors, where an internal rotor containing permanent magnets or a large iron core with salient poles is controlled by a set of external magnets that are switched electronically. A stepper motor may also be thought of as a cross between a DC electric motor and a solenoid. As each coil is energized in turn, the rotor aligns itself with the magnetic field produced by the energized field winding. Unlike a synchronous motor, in its application, the motor may not rotate continuously; instead, it "steps" from one position to the next as field windings are energized and de-energized in sequence. Depending on the sequence, the rotor may turn forwards or backwards.
Simple stepper motor drivers entirely energize or entirely de-energize the field windings, leading the rotor to "cog" to a limited number of positions; more sophisticated drivers can proportionally control the power to the field windings, allowing the rotors to position "between" the "cog" points and thereby rotate extremely smoothly. Computer controlled stepper motors are one of the most versatile forms of positioning systems, particularly when part of a digital servo-controlled system.
Stepper motors can be rotated to a specific angle with ease, and hence stepper motors are used in pre-gigabyte era computer disk drives, where the precision they offered was adequate for the correct positioning of the read/write head of a hard disk drive. As drive density increased, the precision limitations of stepper motors made them obsolete for hard drives, thus newer hard disk drives use read/write head control systems based on voice coils.
Stepper motors were upscaled to be used in electric vehicles under
the term SRM (switched reluctance machine).
Coreless DC motors
Nothing in the design of any of the motors described above requires that the iron (steel) portions of the rotor actually rotate; torque is exerted only on the windings of the electromagnets. Taking advantage of this fact is the coreless DC motor, a specialized form of a brush DC motor. Optimized for rapid acceleration, these motors have a rotor that is constructed without any iron core. The rotor can take the form of a winding-filled cylinder inside the stator magnets, a basket surrounding the stator magnets, or a flat pancake (possibly formed on a printed wiring board) running between upper and lower stator magnets. The windings are typically stabilized by being impregnated with epoxy resins.
Because the rotor is much lighter in weight (mass) than a conventional rotor formed from copper windings on steel laminations, the rotor can accelerate much more rapidly, often achieving a mechanical time constant under 1 ms. This is especially true if the windings use aluminum rather than the heavier copper. But because there is no metal mass in the rotor to act as a heat sink, even small coreless motors must often be cooled by forced air.
These motors were commonly used to drive the capstan(s) of magnetic tape drives and are still widely used in high-performance servo-controlled systems.
Series Wound DC motor
The distinguishing design of a Series Wound DC motor is that the field windings and the armature are electrically connected in series. Torque and speed control are achieved by a ‘throttle’ that varies the intensity of current flowing through the fields and the armature. Series wound motors offer very high starting torques and good torque output per ampere, but have generally poor speed regulation. DC motors have high torque at low speeds and decreasing torque as the speed increases.
This is how the golf carts were designed for many years. But there are some problems with this design. The largest problem was the ‘Free Wheeling’ nature of this system when the golf cart goes down hill. The only thing to keep the golf cart from going dangerously fast (if the hill is steep enough) is to use the Cart’s brakes. As accidents and incidents piled up, golf cart Manufacturing companies became increasingly concerned about creating an electric golf cart that has built in safety features. Enter separately excited field DC Motors.
Separately excited field DC Motors
The separately excited field DC Motors are different from Series Wound DC Motors primarily in the way the field is wound. Series motors create the electromagnetic field using very large wire and a high amperage.
It so happens, however, that you can get the very same flux field with much smaller wire and much less current flow by making many more turns. A field of flux, then, is a function of “Ampere (current)-Turns”.
The difference is very significant! A series wound field has a current of, say, 300 amps. The same separately excited field has a current of only 20 amps. It has been known for a long while that a computer programmed controller could be built to control a 300 amp field, but the components and size would be unacceptable if only from a cost standpoint. The 20 amp current of a separately excited field motor is a different story. A computerized program controller can be designed to provide a wide variety of control over the fields to result in a wide variety of performances. And the most important thing is that it could be built within an acceptable manufacturing cost.
So if a controller can be built to manipulate the electric fields of a
DC motor, then we can Control the motor to make it do the things that we
want it to do. And from this possibility came all these new innovations
to modern day Electric golf carts. Rollaway Protection, downhill
Regenerative Braking and Torque/Speed Controls for a wide variety
of conditions are now available. The constant implication, of course, is
that Safety features can now be created.
Single-phase AC induction motors
A common single-phase AC motor is the split-phase induction motor,
commonly used in major appliances such as washing machines and
clothes dryers. Compared to the shaded pole motor, these motors can
generally provide much greater starting torque by using a special
startup winding in conjunction with a centrifugal switch.
In the split-phase motor, the startup winding is designed with a
higher resistance than the running winding. This creates an LR
circuit which slightly shifts the phase of the current in the startup
winding. When the motor is starting, the startup winding is connected
to the power source via a set of spring-loaded contacts pressed upon
by the not-yet-rotating centrifugal switch. The starting winding is
wound with fewer turns of smaller wire than the main winding, so it
has a lower inductance (L) and higher resistance (R). The lower L/R
ratio creates a small phase shift, not more than about 30 degrees,
between the flux due to the main winding and the flux of the starting
winding. The starting direction of rotation may be reversed simply by
exchanging the connections of the startup winding relative to the
running winding.
The phase of the magnetic field in this startup winding is shifted
from the phase of the mains power, allowing the creation of a moving
magnetic field which starts the motor. Once the motor reaches near
design operating speed, the centrifugal switch activates, opening the
contacts and disconnecting the startup winding from the power source.
The motor then operates solely on the running winding. The starting
winding must be disconnected since it would increase the losses in
the motor.
In a capacitor start motor, a starting capacitor is inserted in
series with the startup winding, creating an LC circuit which is
capable of a much greater phase shift (and so, a much greater
starting torque). The capacitor naturally adds expense to such
motors.
Another variation is the Permanent Split-Capacitor (PSC) motor (also
known as a capacitor start and run motor). This motor operates
similarly to the capacitor-start motor described above, but there is
no centrifugal starting switch and the second winding is permanently
connected to the power source. PSC motors are frequently used in air
handlers, fans, and blowers and other cases where a variable speed is
desired. By changing taps on the running winding but keeping the load
constant, the motor can be made to run at different speeds. Also
provided all 6 winding connections are available separately, a 3
phase motor can be converted to a capactor start and run motor by
commoning two of the windings and connecting the third via a
capacitor to act as a start winding.
Induction generator
The construction of an induction generator is essentially the same as
that of an induction motor: Both have a squirrel-cage rotor and wound
stator. When this machine is driven above its designed synchronous
speed, it becomes a generator; at less than synchronous speed, it
functions as a motor. Because the induction generator does not have
an exciter, it must operate in parallel with the utility. This
outside power source provides the reactive power for generator
operation. Also, its frequency is automatically locked in with the
utility.
|
Electric Motors
The various winding configurations of electric motors
have lost much of their significance with the advent of electronic
controls. The use of series fields over shunt, of DC power over AC
have lost their advantage. Electronic Converters can give a shunt
wound motor just as much starting torque as a series wound motor, and
can convert AC to DC and back again to optimize voltage, current and
frequency for maximum power and efficiency.
No matter how much the controls change, the basic
fact remains that all electric motors use an alternating current in
one or more windings. AC can be used direct, DC can be converted to
AC either electronically or mechanically by the use of a commutator
and carbon brushes. Traditional mechanical methods are simple and
reliable, but cannot be optimal for all load-speed conditions.
Electronic methods are often more efficient over a wider range of
load-speed conditions, but are expensive and more easily damaged by
transient voltages or currents.
Another basic fact is that motor torque is
proportional to the number of armature amp-turns, armature size, and
the strength of the magnetic field around the armature. The magnetic
field increases with the amp-turns of the field. The increase is
proportional until the magnetic path begins to saturate. The strength
of the magnetic field is basically limited by the quality of the
magnetic material. The amount of the magnetic field is limited by the
area of the magnetic material and heat which limits field current.
Armature current is also limited by heat. All small, high power
motors require external cooling.
Motor power is proportional to torque and speed. One
of the biggest advantages of electronic controls is the efficient
conversion of power to high frequency AC. Motors with an excess of
400 Horsepower have been built with speeds greater than 20,000 RPM.
The ability to put a lot of power is a small space is only available
with electronic conversion.
Limitations of mechanical commutation limit maximum
motor speed. Part of the job of commutation is to "discharge"
windings as they leave one pole and head for another. In series wound
motors, the location of the brushes is often shifted to optimize one
direction of rotation. Large shunt wound motors often employ
commutating field windings (aka interpole windings) between the main
field windings. These are wired in series with the armature and
induce a voltage in the armature to help neutralize the energy in the
windings being commutated. Without commutating field windings, the
brushes must dissipate this energy and can overheat at high speeds.
High speed operation greatly increases brush wear.
Shunt Motors
The amount of voltage generated by a shunt motor is
proportional the magnetic field and motor speed. The speed at which
this generated voltage is equal to battery voltage with maximum field
current is a critical design parameter in electric vehicle design.
This speed is the maximum speed at which full torque is available,
and is also the slowest speed at which simple regenerative braking
can charge a battery. (Call this regen speed.) Dynamic braking can be
used at slower speeds by connecting the armature to a resistive load.
Above this speed, the motor is horsepower limited. Of course
commutation limitations and mechanical strength limit maximum motor
speed.
A typical driving cycle would start accelerating a
vehicle from a stop with maximum field current, and armature current
limited to a safe value. A constant motor torque would give a
constant acceleration (neglecting increasing vehicle losses) until
regen speed is reached. Above this speed, the armature is connected
directly to the battery and armature current is maintained by a field
current which decreases with increasing speed until maximum motor
speed is reached. Torque decreases with decreasing field current so
acceleration also decreases. At maximum speed, field current is
increased to decrease armature current and torque as necessary to
maintain a constant speed. To slow down, field current is further
increased as necessary to cause the motor to reverse armature current
and thus charge the battery. The vehicle slows down until maximum
field current is reached at regen speed. Below this speed, dynamic
breaking can be used to augment mechanical brakes. Note that
mechanical brakes must be used in addition to regenerative braking if
a fast stop is necessary. Maximum armature current must not be
exceeded. As the motor temperature increases, maximum armature and
fields currents must be reduced which significantly reduces maximum
motor torque.
Note all the energy supplied to accelerate the
vehicle is not recovered during regenerative breaking. One of the
major losses is that a battery is recharged at a higher voltage then
it is discharged. (i.e. a 144 volt battery might take 170 volts to
charge, but only return 120 volts under load.) Another loss is the
motors I2R losses, the heat created by current and
resistance in the armature, and the power consumed by the field.
To correctly design an electric vehicle, the motor
characteristics must be known. For a shunt motor the following
questions must be asked:
DESIGN VOLTAGE
MAXIMUM RPM
MAXIMUM TORQUE
MAXIMUM OUTPUT POWER
MAXIMUM CONTINUOUS OUTPUT POWER
MAXIMUM ARMATURE CURRENT
MAXIMUM CONTINUOUS ARMATURE CURRENT
MAXIMUM FIELD CURRENT
MAXIMUM CONTINUOUS FIELD CURRENT
BACK EMF PER RPM AT VARIOUS FIELD CURRENTS:
(Including maximum and max continuous)
TORQUE AS A FUNCTION OF BOTH
FIELD & ARMATURE CURRENTS
EFFICIENCY AS A FUNCTION OF SPEED AND TORQUE
As an example, the following shunt wound motor has
been designed:
DESIGN BATTERY VOLTAGE 144 volts
DESIGN BATTERY RESISTANCE .06 ohm
REGEN RPM 3600 rpm
MAXIMUM RPM 5000 rpm
MAXIMUM CONTINUOUS TORQUE 30 lb - ft
MAXIMUM OUTPUT POWER 40 hp
MAXIMUM CONTINUOUS OUTPUT POWER 20 hp
MAXIMUM ARMATURE CURRENT 250 amps
MAXIMUM CONTINUOUS ARMATURE CURRENT 125 amps
MAXIMUM FIELD CURRENT 3.5 amps
MAXIMUM CONTINUOUS FIELD CURRENT 2.0 amps
RESISTANCE OF ARMATURE 0.04 ohm
RESISTANCE OF FIELD 40 ohms
BACK EMF PER RPM AT VARIOUS FIELD CURRENTS:
field amps volts/rpm torque/armature-amp
0.0 0.001 0.01
0.5 0.009 0.07
1.0 0.017 0.14
1.5 0.024 0.19
2.0 0.030 0.24
2.5 0.035 0.28
3.0 0.038 0.30
3.5 0.040 0.32
Obviously, the armature current is the difference
between the applied EMF and the back EMF divided by the armature
resistance. For example, if the applied voltage is 105 volts, and the
back EMF is 100 volts, then 5/.05 = 100 amps. If either the motor
speed or field current is increased, the back EMF would increase, the
armature current would decrease, and torque would decrease. At zero
armature current there would be no torque. With further increase in
motor speed or field current, the armature current would flow in the
opposite direction which would make the motor a generator. i.e. it
would absorb mechanical power and supply electrical power.
The back EMF times the armature current represents
real work, the power that is output after frictional losses are
deducted. I2R losses include:
1. (Armature current)2 x (Armature Resistance)
2. (Field current)2 x (Field Resistance)
For example, with the motor at full continuous power:
Speed = 3600 rpm
Torque = 30 lb - ft
Power = 3600 x 30 x 2 x pi / 550 = 20.5 hp
20.5 x .746 = 15.3 KW
Motor Voltage = 144 - .06 x 125 = 136.5 volts
Armature Current = (136.5 - 131.5) / 0.04 = 125 amps
Field Current = 2.7 amps
Back EMF = .0365 x 3600 = 131.5 volts
Power Input = 136.5 x 125 + 2.7 x 2.7 x 40 = 17.35 KW
Efficiency = 15.3/17.35 = 88 %
Note that the (17.35 - 15.3) 2.05 KW loss is
dissipated as heat.
Now if the field current is increased to 3.5 amps,
then the back EMF will equal the battery voltage (i.e. .04 * 3600 =
144 volts) and then the armature current and therefore torque would
become 0. Or if the speed was increased to 3798 rpm then the back EMF
would again equal battery voltage and the armature current and torque
would be 0. With the field current at 2.7 amps and a speed of 3996
rpm, then the armature current would be minus 125 amps (i.e. the
motor would be a generator charging the battery) and the torque would
be minus 30 lb - ft.
If this seems complicated, it really isn't. Just
remember the following:
1. The field current determines the strength of the motor's magnetic field.
2. The strength of the magnetic field times speed determines the back EMF.
(motor voltage without armature current)
3. The difference between the applied motor voltage and back EMF, divided by the
armature resistance, determines the armature current.
4. The strength of the magnetic field times the armature current determines the
output torque.
5. The output torque times motor speed determines the output power.
6. The sum of (Armature current)2 x (Armature Resistance) and
(Field current)2 x (Field Resistance) determines input power.
7. Output power divided by input power determines efficiency.
Series Wound Motor
To give a feel for a typical Series Wound Motor, a
typical Advanced DC Motor is discussed below. Note that the picture
below shows the basic construction of a series wound motor.
Typical Advanced DC Motor
Advanced DC Motors Model 203-06-4001
amps = (5 * torque) + 85
RPM = (286 * volts) / (10 + torque)0.5
The Advanced DC Motor Model 203-06-4001 is a typical,
series wound motor that is often used in Electric Vehicles. It can be
reasonably characterized with the above two equations. Note that
torque is measured in ft-lbs. The motor is about 8 inches in
diameter, almost 15 inches long (not including shaft), and weighs
about 107 pounds. It is designed for a maximum voltage of 120 volts.
With an input of 91 volts and 178 amps, it can continuously deliver
19 horsepower at 5000 rpm. With an input of 86 volts and 322 amps, it
can deliver 31.5 horsepower at 3600 rpm for about 5 minutes. Both of
these ratings assume standard ambient temperature. Power generation
is limited by heat. Maximum speed is about 8000 rpm, but high speed
operation results in greatly increased brush wear.
Series wound motors are also known as traction motors
since they can generate great torque at low speed. But only for a
short time. Great torque requires great current which quickly heats
the motor.
It should be noted, that comparing electric motors
with gasoline engines is like comparing apples and oranges. Gasoline
engines are rated at their peak power, and electric
motors are rated at their continuous power. It is for
this reason that a 30 hp electric motor will generally perform like a
50 hp gasoline engine in a same weight vehicle. Of course the
addition of a large number of batteries will diminish the vehicle's
ability to accelerate or climb hills.
|
GENERATOR
|
3 Phase Rotating magnetic field
|
ELECTRIC MOTOR
|
|
KITPLANES Magazine, April 2003
Electric Powered Aircraft - Part 3
Motor and propeller selection are the topics this time.
By James Dunn
This article is the third in a special multipart series. Part 1 (April
'02) outlined the background and challenges involved in developing an
electric-powered airplane and the overall significance of this
challenging project. Part 2 (September '02) explained the approach used
to select the ideal aircraft to electrify and the specifications of the
candidate airframe selected for this project. This month's article
covers the selection of the electric motor and propeller and explains
the performance benefits and power available from a high-efficiency
electric drive system.
Project Objectives
This project focuses on designing, building and testing a safe,
practical two-place general aviation airplane powered by DC electricity
from fuel cells and advanced rechargeable batteries. The airplane can
take off, fly more than 250 miles on a singe charge, and land safely.
This breakthrough project is being developed with special funding from
NASA and the Foundation for Advancing Science and Technology Education
(FASTec), a not-for-profit 501-c3 program. The charter is to explore
new frontiers in science while educating our population on the benefits
of advanced energy storage and transportation systems. If successful,
this unique aircraft could create a new paradigm for future
transportation technology, paving the way for the next century of
flight. To demonstrate the feasibility and usefulness of electrically
propelled aircraft, an existing light-weight, low-drag, carbon
composite aircraft is being converted to electric propulsion, replacing
the typical gasoline-powered internal-combustion (IC) engine with a
special high-efficiency electric drive system with advanced controls
and instruments. The electricity to power the aircraft will be provided
by a bank of advanced high-energy rechargeable batteries, augmented in
Phase II by a hydrogen-powered fuel cell to extend the range.
Why Electric Aircraft?
Electric-powered aircraft offer many benefits including dramatic
improvements in reliability and safety, lower maintenance and total
lifecycle costs, significant improvements in environmental
compatibility (noise, emissions and fuel), improved performance, and
improvements in ease of operation and passenger comfort. The biggest
benefits are reliability and safety. With only one moving part (motor
armature plus propeller), electrically powered aircraft should be far
less susceptible to failure; there's not much to fail. Electric drive
also offers significant improvements in performance. Initially,
performance of conventional GA planes - particularly overall range -
will be difficult to match.
But in terms of total available peak power per pound, electric motors
have a huge benefit over gasoline-fueled engines. For a similar power
rating, the electric motor can weigh significantly less than a
comparable gasoline engine and produce significantly more peak power.
This is due to the much higher operation efficiency and short term
over-power potential of electric motors, allowing them to produce up to
300% of rated power for short durations, critical for takeoff, rapid
climb and missed approaches. Electric motors will also offer
dramatically better performance at altitude because they do not breathe
air and don't suffer from loss of power at high altitude. The are also
immune to carburetor icing and fuel contamination. The aircraft
selected for conversion is a high-performance, all-carbon, two-place
French DynAero Lafayette III provided by American Ghiles Aircraft in
Dijon, France.
Motor Selection
To begin the propulsion system selection process, we established
several basic objectives:
1.The primary goal was to match the performance of the standard
gasoline-powered version of the Lafayette III Bushplane...still using a
tractor-type drive configuration.
2.The second objective was to provide the highest level of total energy
efficiency, providing the best performance, range and operating time,
along with the least amount of electrical energy. This includes the
combined efficiency of all components from the energy source
(batteries) to the motor and propeller.
3.The third objective was to minimize the total weight of the
propulsion system components because the energy source components will
be significantly heavier than the gasoline and tanks it will be
replacing. Total propulsion system and energy source weight is critical
to range and payload.
4.The final objective was to select components that had already proven
their reliability with a minimum of 50 units being successfully
deployed in field applications. This is particularly important because
the overall reliability and safety are the most important overall
considerations in pioneering aviation projects like this.
Target Power Level. The normal engine of the target aircraft is a Rotax
912S, which produces 100 hp at 6500 rpm. The Lafayette III, however, is
an extremely efficient design, providing exceptional performance with
only 80 hp (130-knot cruise and 180-knot top speed). Because electric
motors can typically produce significantly more power for short
periods, we targeted the motor power level selection toward the optimum
cruise power levers, knowing the motor has the ability to produce
similar peak power levels to the Rotax 912 for takeoff and climbing
flight. We also decided to look for a motor that would produce peak
torque at low revs (1200-2700 rpm), thereby eliminating the need for
reduction gearing
The 71 -hp brushless DC motor from UQM Technologies Corp.,
constant-speed Airmaster propeller system with Warp Drive blades is
ready for further testing. that is typical of most Rotax engine
installations. Eliminating the need for gears or belts and pulleys not
only reduces the weight but also increases the overall reliability and
efficiency of the electric propulsion system. Electric motors have a
huge power density benefit over gasoline-fueled IC engines,
particularly in terms of total peak power. Thus, for a similar power
rating, an electric motor can weigh as little as 50% of the weight of a
comparable gasoline engine, yet still produce significantly more peak
power. This is due to the much higher operating efficiency and
short-term over-power potential of electric motors. Electric motors are
usually rated in kilowatts (kW); 1 hp= 746 W (or 1 kW =1.33 hp). Our
target electric motor power level is 40-60kW (53-80 hp).
Efficiency. Electric motor technology is quite mature, with numerous
high-efficiency brushless DC and AC induction motors currently
available that should be suitable for aircraft applications. Most
modern electric motors provide efficiencies of 80-95%, based upon the
basic motor design approach. This is a dramatic contrast to the
efficiency of most typical IC engines of only 18-23% (diesel engines
provide much higher efficiencies of 27-36%, but still significantly
lower than electric motors). Our target was to find a motor and
controller combination that would provide at least 90% total combined
efficiency over the target operating band of 1500-2700rpm (prop speed).
Several basic motor design approaches were considered including both AC
and DC designs. Weight. Although the Lafayette III has an extremely
high empty-to-gross-weight range, we need to reserve as much weight
capacity as possible for the energy source (batteries, fuel cell, and
other system components) as time is the critical factor that will
determine our useful range and payload. The total firewall-forward
weight of the Rotax engine - complete with muffler and all peripheral
equipment and gasoline tank - was estimated to be 165 pounds. As a
rough rule of thumb, DC motors can produce approximately 1 hp per pound
in the size range we were seeking (50-100 hp). After talking with a
number of motor suppliers, we set a target weight goal of 110 pounds
for the combined motor and controller (leaving 55 pounds for the
heat-exchange system and instruments). The propeller was assumed to
weigh approximately the same as similar propellers for gasoline-powered
aircraft.
Budgeting Weight
The basic target weight breakdown for the E-plane is as follows:
Empty mass of airframe 345 lbs.
Motor/controller 110 lbs.
Propeller and hub 26 lbs.
Motor mount/heat exchange 22 lbs.
Batteries 330 lbs.
Instruments/equipment 33 lbs.
Total weight Figure 1. Basic System Components. 867 lbs.
Picking the Best
Several different motor technologies and design methods are used in
industry including AC- and DC-powered design approaches. The most
efficient designs typically use permanent magnets (instead of coils) in
the stators. These require less energy to create the basic magnetic
field, with permanent-magnet brushless DC motors usually being much
more efficient than older brush-equipped designs. They also offer much
higher reliability and virtually no maintenance. After reviewing
several candidate motor designs, we decided that a brushless DC
permanent-magnet (BDC-PM) design would be best suited for our
application, rather than an induction, switched-reluctance, or other
motor design configuration. Although brushless DC motors require a more
sophisticated controller unit (typically a three-phase, pulse
width-modulated [PWM]), total efficiency is typically 3-7% higher than
brush-style motor. (Brushless motors replace the brushes and
commutators with a controller that electronically switched the power to
the coils, eliminating the brush and commutator wear and arcing).
Brush-type motors were also eliminated from selection due to the use of
hydrogen on board for the fuel cells and the risk of ignition from
sparks produced by the brushes. After significant analysis, we created
the following requirements for the electric motor:
Target Motor Specs
Motor type: Three-phase brushless DC permanent magnet motor (or AC
Induction). Continuous power: 15-30 kW (20-40 hp) at prop shaft @
1600-2200 rpm (direct drive). Climb power: 30-50 kW (40-67 hp) for 5
minutes at prop shaft @ 1800-2400 rpm. Maximum takeoff power: 45-70 kW
peak (60-94 hp) for 1 min. @ 2400-2800 rpm prop speed. Maximum torque:
240 Nm from 1200-2700 rpm (torque vs. rpm is flexible with a
variable-pitch prop, but high torque at low rpm is important). Target
weight: 110 lb. total for motor, controller (+ gearbox, if needed).
Operating Voltage: 200-350 VDC (operating voltage bus target = 270
VDC). Motor efficiency: 90-95% over operating range from 15-70 kW.
Total drive system efficiency: 85-90% overall including loss in
controller, motor (and gearbox, if needed). Cooling system: Oil, water
or air (typical radiator and pump). Motor size: Diameter less than 12
in., length less than 15 in. preferable. Controller size: Less than 1
cu. ft., and less than 30 lb.
The Gang of 12
A study was done of available motors that met the target requirements,
and a total of 12 motor candidates were analyzed with the help of
Solectria Corp. in Woburn, Massachusetts. Nine motor manufacturers
considered were AC Propulsion, Fisher Electrical, GE, Kollmorgen, Lynx
Motion Technology, Solectria, Technologies M4, UQM Technologies, and
Zytek. Of the 12 candidate motors, only three suppliers appeared to
come close to meeting the target requirements. They were Technologies
M4
Here are close-ups of the UQM Tech EV 53 motor and CD40-400L
controller. of Toronto, Zytek of the U.K., and UQM Technologies of
Golden, Colorado.
The best candidates from the three key suppliers were the Zytek PM4.2
60-kW BDC liquid-cooled motor with an MC6.2 controller; Technologies
M4-B2R-670 Drive system using a 75-kW induction type; and the UQM
Technologies Corp. Caliber EV53 53-kW BDC motor with a CD40- 400
controller.
The final motor selected was the EV218 53-kW (71 hp) brushless DC motor
from UQM Technologies Corp. This motor offered the best overall fit
with our requirements. It has been used in a wide range of electric
vehicles and other demanding applications. The only drawback of
high-performance motors is the cost, due primarily to the relatively
low-volume production. If produced in high volumes, motors like this
should cost no more than $3000, versus about $15,000 currently.
Propeller Selection
Objectives. The propeller for the electric drive should meet or exceed
the performance of the normal recommended propeller for our AGA
airframe: an MT three-blade prop made in Germany.
1. The main objective was to optimize the propeller efficiency and
suitability for use with direct electric motor drive. Because the
electric motor selected produced optimum torque at low rpm (in the
1000-2500 rpm range), direct drive was possible, eliminating the need
for speed reduction.
2. The ideal application with the most operating flexibility should
provide the means to operate as a variable-pitch prop, or in
constant-speed mode, with a control system that allows the pilot the
option of setting the prop pitch to a specific setting or using the
constant-speed option (maintaining a fixed propeller speed).
3. An electrically actuated propeller was required as our aircraft has
no hydraulic or vacuum system.
4. Propeller system weight should be kept to a minimum, ideally under
20 pounds.
The candidates included MT, Airmaster, Warp Drive and Ivoprop. (Other
manufacturers may also offer suitable props, but these were the
candidates suggested by the aircraft manufacturer.)
Although all of the propeller choices offered benefits, the Airmaster
AP332, a high-quality, electrically operated constant-speed propeller
system, was selected for several reasons.
1. The Airmaster AP332 propeller has demonstrated good performance on a
wide range of aircraft with engines in a similar power range to ours.
These aircraft included several high-performance aircraft in the same
class as the Lafayette, most notably the Europa. (See the applications
part of the Airmaster web-site http://www.propeller.com/.)
2. The Airmaster propeller is also fully feathering with a consequent
large pitch range. This feature seemed of interest as it could allow
for future investigation of using the windmilling propeller to provide
regenerative power generation on descent.
3. The Airmaster AP332 propeller control system has extremely low power
consumption; only about 1A current is drawn while the propeller is
changing pitch (a couple of
Figure 2. Motor-prop adaptor assembly.
seconds occasionally), which is significantly less than most other
electric hubs.
4. The Airmaster AC200 electronic constant-speed controller is
completely configurable by the operator. This means that with simple
programming, you have complete control over the preset speeds
programmed into the controller. Using the Auto/Manual mode, the pilot
also has the option of selecting specific pitch settings to quickly
match the electric motor output and propeller performance for specific
predefined flight modes.
5. Airmaster uses Warp Drive composite blades providing a
high-aspect-ratio blade platform. Warp Drive propellers are built using
an all-carbon-fiber matrix. No foam, fiberglass or gelcoat is used in
these blades. The structural, performance and practical advantages of a
carbon propeller over any fiberglass, wood or metal prop are many,
including superior strength, light weight, and (we hope) a longer
useful life. The construction of Warp Drive's blades allows for simple
repair of basic nicks and gouges, and the blades are individually
replaceable. We determined this to be the best blade platform for the
aircraft, motor power, prop diameter (68 inches) and target airspeed
range.
Airmaster Propellers Ltd. has supported our project greatly, even
providing a propeller at no cost. The company sees the advanced
technology of its propeller systems as a good match to the
ground-breaking technology focus of our project.
Prop Adaptor and Mounting
To minimize mechanical losses, it was determined that the propeller
should ideally be connected directly to the motor shaft, eliminating
the complexity of gears, belts and pulleys. This was accomplished by
designing a special propeller adaptor assembly. (See Figure 2.) The
propeller adaptor assembly includes 10 machined parts plus mounting
bolts.
The total combined propulsion system efficiency was optimized with the
UQM Technologies motor directly driving the Airmaster propeller, with
no losses to gearing or belt reduction systems. The total aircraft
reliability is also enhanced with fewer parts to fail. Although this
specific propulsion system offers an extremely high total overall
operating efficiency, there are several other configurations that could
also provide suitable performance for this unique application.
What's Next?
Picking the energy source to power the electric drive will be the topic
next time. The airplane has begun first taxi tests using batteries not
intended for flight. First flights with airworthy batteries are
expected in a few months.
James Dunn is president of Advanced Technology Products, Inc. and vice
president of CTC/FASTec. He is currently involved in the development of
a piloted electric aircraft. For more information, contact him at CTC,
1400 Computer Dr., Westborough, MA 01581; e-mail jdunn@ctc.org. Track
the fuel-cell project on the web at http://www.aviationtomorrow.com/.
The electric airplane project won Dunn's organization a 2002 Technical
Innovation award from Aviation Week & Space Technology magazine.
|
Sally, from the movie, Cars

a 1 or 2 month sample:
The safest web sites are viewed
best with trusted browsers
|
|